|
Automatic Computer Density Correction of the
Phase Dynamics
print
article
Phase Dynamics calibrates at
the factory with an oil of approximately 865 kg/m3.
For this density of oil you do not need any "Cal Factor"
in the analyzer and the display should be correct with a sample
that you analyze. Any measurement using electric dipole moment
physics (capacitance, RF and microwave) as the basis of measurement
looks at the polar moment of the molecule. Oil has very low polarity
and water has a high polarity. When the density increases there
are more molecules per unit area. Therefore a change in density
to a heavier crude makes an analyzer show increased water content
when it is really a change in density.
If the density changes to 846
kg/m3 , then a "Cal Factor" is required that
is equal to approximately:
Cal Factor = - 0.217
x density + (2.3557e -4) x Density^2 - (9.6447e -8)
x density^3 + 73.72 =
[- 0.217
x 846] + [2.3557x 10-4 x (846)2 ] - 9.6447
x 10-8 x (846) 3 + 73.72 = + 0.34
which would be added to the
Phase Dynamics water cut. For lighter oil the density is less,
less molecules per unit area means water cut offset needs to be
added to the calculated water cut.
If the water cut was actually
zero for a 846 kg/m3 crude then Phase Dynamics would
calculate a negative number = 0.34% water cut (if the "Cal
Factor" = 0 ). Since a negative water cut is not displayed the
analyzer would read zero. To obtain a number from the Phase Dynamics
unit, a +0.34% must be entered into the "Cal Factor"
in the Phase Dynamics unit (see the instruction manual). Now all
densities may be handled up to 846 kg/m3 .
If the oil density changes
to a 924 kg/m3 then this heavier oil looks like there
is water in the oil when there is not. The 924 kg/m3
density oil would require that a "Cal Factor" of - 1.76%
be entered to make the 924 kg/m3 oil with no water
appear as zero on the Phase Dynamics unit. This means that the
heavier oil density makes it look like there is +1.76% water there
when there is none (and the Cal Factor = 0). To implement correction
for a heavy oil a negative "Cal Factor" must be placed
into the Phase Dynamics to assure that a water cut above zero
will always be displayed and the output will always be greater
than 4 mA (for a 4-20mA output selection).
The density correction equation
for the Phase Dynamics Analyzer is:
Corrected W/C = [Measured
Water Cut - PDI Cal Factor + Flow Computer Offset] +
- 0.217 x density
+ 2.3557e-4 x Density^2 - 9.6447e-8 x density^3
+ 73.72
|
Where: Measured Water = the 4-20 mA value,
MODBUS® or other water cut value read from the PDI unit.
PDI Cal Factor = "Cal Factor"
entered into the Phase Dynamics unit to assure greater than zero
water cut.
Flow Computer Offset = A value entered
into the flow computer (PLC) to correct the final water cut
Density = FLOWING density (not temperature
corrected) from a densitometer
In the earlier text where the density goes
from 846 to 924 kg/m3 the steps to correct across this
range are described as follows: NOTE: You
MUST USE UNCORRECTED DENSITY. The density
which must be used is AT FLOWING
TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE.
- Calculate the "Cal Factor" required
to make the water cut always read above zero: Use the minimum
density (846 kg/m3) that will be seen to calculate:
Cal Factor = - 0.217
x 846 + 2.3557x 10-4 x (846)2
- 9.6447 x 10-8 x (846) 3 + 73.72 =
+ 0.34 %
Since this is the minimum
required to make the measurement always above zero, a larger
number would be recommended. Arbitrarily use a 0.50% Cal Factor.
- The effect of the heaviest crude would be
to have water appear on the display when there is not any. +1.76%
would be seen on the Analyzers display with zero water
cut in a 924 kg/m3 oil.
EXAMPLES
EXAMPLE 1:
PDI Water Cut Display = 1.35% PDI Cal Factor
= + 0.5% Flow Computer Offset = - 0.30 Density = 846 kg/m3
Actual Water Cut From Lab Analysis = 0.89%
Corrected W/C = [1.35 - (+0.5)
+ (- 0.3)] - 0.217 x 846 + 2.3557x 10-4 x (846)2
- 9.6447 x 10-8 x (846) 3 + 73.72 = 0.55
+ 0.34 = 0.89 %
NOTE: The Flow Computer Offset (-0.30) was determined
by taking a resulting Corrected W/C and correcting it against
the Lab Analysis for several samples.
EXAMPLE 2: PDI Water Cut =3.32%
PDI Cal Factor = + 0.5% Flow Computer Offset = - 0.30 Density
= 924 kg/m3 Actual Water Cut From Lab Analysis = 0.76%
Corrected W/C = [3.32 - (+0.5)
+ (- 0.3)] - 0.217 x 924 + 2.3557x 10-4 x (924)2
- 9.6447 x 10-8 x (924) 3 + 73.72 = 2.52
- 1.76 = 0.76 %
NOTE: The same Flow Computer Offset (-0.30)
was maintained since this was derived from prior data.
EXAMPLE 3: PDI Water Cut
=4.00% PDI Cal Factor = + 0.5% Flow Computer Offset = - 0.30 Density
= 924 kg/m3 Actual Water Cut From Lab Analysis = 1.44%
Corrected W/C = [4.00 - (+0.5)
+ (- 0.3)] -1.76 = 3.2 - 1.76 = 1.44 %
NOTE: If this was a 0-4% analyzer then the output
would be 20 mA for this example. This means that you could not
have greater than 1.44% water cut for the 924 kg/m3
oil and still be able to read it. The solution would be to have
a 0-10% range analyzer instead of the 0-4%.
EXAMPLE: For An Analyzer with a 0.00% to 4.00%
Range - 4% limits ability to correct density
|
Density kg/m3
|
Actual Water Cut (%)
|
Density Offset Calculation (%)
|
PDI "Cal Factor" (%)
|
PDI Internal Calculation Plus "Cal Factor"
(%)
|
PDI Display, Digital or Analog Output (%)
|
Flow Computer Offset (%)
|
Corrected Water Cut Using Equation (%)
|
|
930
|
0.00
|
-1.92
|
+5.00
|
7.44
|
4.00
|
-0.52
|
-3.44 (NG)
|
|
902
|
0.00
|
-1.12
|
+5.00
|
6.66
|
4.00
|
-0.52
|
-2.64 (NG)
|
|
890
|
0.00
|
-0.80
|
+5.00
|
6.32
|
4.00
|
-0.52
|
-2.32 (NG)
|
|
872
|
0.00
|
-0.32
|
+5.00
|
5.84
|
4.00
|
-0.52
|
-1.84 (NG)
|
|
859
|
0.00
|
+0.00
|
+5.00
|
5.52
|
4.00
|
-0.52
|
-1.52 (NG)
|
|
809
|
0.00
|
+1.28
|
+5.00
|
4.24
|
4.00
|
-0.52
|
-0.24 (NG)
|
|
747
|
0.00
|
+2.88
|
+5.00
|
2.64
|
2.64
|
-0.52
|
0.00
|
|
689
|
0.00
|
+4.48
|
+5.00
|
0.52
|
0.52
|
-0.52
|
0.00
|
EXAMPLE: For An Analyzer with a 0.00% to 10.00%
Range - all values are valid for no water.
|
Density kg/m3
|
Actual Water Cut (%)
|
Shift Due to Density (%)
|
PDI "Cal Factor" (%)
|
PDI Internal Calculation Plus "Cal Factor"
(%)
|
PDI Display, Digital or Analog Output (%)
|
Flow Computer Offset (%)
|
Corrected Water Cut Using Equation (%)
|
|
930
|
0.00
|
-1.92
|
+5.00
|
7.44
|
7.44
|
-0.52
|
0.00
|
|
902
|
0.00
|
-1.12
|
+5.00
|
6.66
|
6.66
|
-0.52
|
0.00
|
|
890
|
0.00
|
-0.80
|
+5.00
|
6.32
|
6.32
|
-0.52
|
0.00
|
|
872
|
0.00
|
-0.32
|
+5.00
|
5.84
|
5.84
|
-0.52
|
0.00
|
|
859
|
0.00
|
-0.00
|
+5.00
|
5.52
|
5.52
|
-0.52
|
0.00
|
|
809
|
0.00
|
+1.28
|
+5.00
|
4.24
|
4.24
|
-0.52
|
0.00
|
|
747
|
0.00
|
+2.88
|
+5.00
|
2.64
|
2.64
|
-0.52
|
0.00
|
|
689
|
0.00
|
+4.48
|
+5.00
|
0.52
|
0.52
|
-0.52
|
0.00
|
EXAMPLE: 0-10% Range Analyzer with varying density
and water cut: large density swing limits high end.
|
Density kg/m3
|
Actual Water Cut (%)
|
Shift Due to Density (%)
|
PDI "Cal Factor" (%)
|
PDI Internal Calculation Plus "Cal Factor"
(%)
|
PDI Display, Digital or Analog Output (%)
|
Flow Computer Offset (%)
|
Corrected Water Cut Using Equation (%)
|
|
930
|
0.00
|
-1.92
|
+5.00
|
7.44
|
7.44
|
-0.52
|
0.00
|
|
930
|
1.00
|
-1.92
|
+5.00
|
8.44
|
8.44
|
-0.52
|
1.00
|
|
930
|
4.00
|
-1.92
|
+5.00
|
11.44
|
10.00
|
-0.52
|
2.56 (NG)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
689
|
0.00
|
+4.48
|
+5.00
|
0.52
|
0.52
|
-0.52
|
0.00
|
|
689
|
1.00
|
+4.48
|
+5.00
|
1.52
|
1.52
|
-0.52
|
1.00
|
|
689
|
4.00
|
+4.48
|
+5.00
|
4.52
|
4.52
|
-0.52
|
4.00
|
|
689
|
10.00
|
+4.48
|
+5.00
|
10.52
|
10.00
|
-0.52
|
8.96 (NG)
|
NOTE: (NG) = not a good number
Effect of Density Adjustment
on Instrument Range (0-4% or 0-10%)
A 4-20 mA signal scaled from
zero to four percent water cut is used to send the uncorrected
water cut to the PLC. Since this number is uncorrected, the actual
water cut range of the 4-20 mA is limited to the zero point of
the heavier crude density water cut offset as the table below
shows.
|
Actual
W/C %
|
Displayed W/C Including a "Cal
Factor" = 0.5%
|
|
Density = 924
|
Density = 859
|
Density =846
|
|
0.0
|
1.77+0.5=2.26
|
0.0+0.5=0.50
|
-0.32+0.5=0.16
|
|
0.4
|
2.17+0.5=2.66
|
0.4+0.5=0.90
|
0.08+0.5=0.56
|
|
1.0
|
2.77+0.5=3.26
|
1.0+0.5=1.50
|
0.68+0.5=1.16
|
|
2.0
|
4.00 Overrange (4.26)
|
2.0+0.5=2.50
|
1.68+0.5=2.16
|
|
3.0
|
4.00 Overrange (5.26)
|
3.0+0.5=3.50
|
2.68+0.5=3.16
|
|
4.0
|
4.00 Overrange (6.26)
|
4.00 Overrange (4.5)
|
4.00 Overrange (4.16)
|
Therefore, the heavier crude limits
the water cut obtainable with a 0-4% ranged instrument to a range
of actual water cuts:
from 0.0% Real W/C (2.27%
on display)
to 4.00% - 2.27% = 1.73% (4.00%
on display)
for the heavy 924 kg/m3
crude only. A 0-10% Range Low Range Analyzer is usually recommended
for this type of application to maintain a good water cut range
across all densities of crude.
If a digital interface to the
Phase Dynamics system is being used, a corrected "Cal Factor"
may be written to the analyzer to have the display equal the actual
water cut. Otherwise, you may select an optional feature where
the 4-20mA Input for Flow is used to select a Cal Factor. One
additional manner In which to handle this is to use the optional
feature 4-20 mA input for Flow instead as a stream select where
each "Stream" has a different Cal Factor stored.
Data Sheet for Density
Correction Problem Determination
|
Sample
ID
|
Date
Time
|
Flowing Density
|
PDI
"Cal Factor"
(%)
|
PDI
Temperature
Deg. C or F
|
PDI
Display
(%)
|
PLC*
Offset (%)
|
PLC **
Water Cut (%)
|
Lab
W/C
(%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTES: The PDI "Cal Factor" is the water
cut offset entered into the Phase Dynamics, Inc. analyzer in order
to always have a positive water cut with the lightest density crude.
* This is the offset put into the PLC to
offset the error between the lab and the PLC displayed at the time
of the sample. This number is added to the density correction and
then displayed as the PLC W/C %
** This is the PLC reading after all of the math to correct for
density is done.
REMARKS:
- Describe the method used in the Laboratory
to analyze the sample.
- What is the sample size?
- How was the sample obtained. Location of
the sample port and how the port is situated on the main line.
- Is there a static mixer upstream?
|